I started this movie not expecting much. I am not a paranormal fan, found footage is not a favorite genre. I tend to go against the grain when it comes to these movies. I love Cloverfield, it’s a guilty pleasure I turn to when I’m feeling sick. You don’t have to think about it, just enjoy the ride. Paranormal Activity is not a bad series, but the long drawn out moments where absolutely nothing is happening makes them such a snooze. So, I went into Host happy to hear it was a smooth 57 minutes long. Even if it let me down, I only lost an hour. Then to my surprise, I spent that hour growing increasingly tense and engaged. It’s hard to scare me, I watch too many movies, specifically horror, to be easily frightened by any movie, but the tension did affect me. I was concerned and uncomfortable as supernatural phenomena began to change the participants of the séance. As the action increased, I worried more and became more focused on the screen. I recommend this movie for any horror/thriller fan. I also recommend watching the film on your laptop instead of the big screen for the best experience.
The film originated from a zoom prank gone viral that Rob Savage decided could become a film. Proof that from boredom, creativity can blossom. Gemma Hurley, Rob Savage, and Jeb Sheppard managed to create something unique with Host. This movie’s small zoom room experience pulls the watcher in and makes them feel like they are a part of the film. As we sit home during the pandemic, we have all begun to use Zoom like platforms to connect with friends, family, and co-workers on an almost daily basis. The familiarity with the medium provides the viewer with a connection to the actors that we don’t typically experience as we view a movie. I often sit in on meetings watching others, listening to them talk, maybe letting my mind wander. These experiences have become mundane. Now they can terrify.
Filmed entirely using social distancing practices with each actor separated in real life, the movie essentially captures pandemic life. Fantastically the director pulled in a wonderful female writer, Gemma Hurley, to add to the script, so the story points are there filled in with a believable female perspective and dynamic. The actor’s conversations are organic and feel unscripted because, for the most part, they are. To understand how the script was developed, a great interview was done on Nightmare on Film Street Podcast with the Gemma Hurley, Rob Savage, and Jeb Sheppard, Fantastic listen!
As the Séance continues, the scares begin, and Haley’s friends do not take things seriously despite initial warnings. This is how things start to fall apart. It had me begin to wonder, who will get it first, what will happen, but of course, I got it wrong (YES!). As the scares increased, I could feel my heart beat faster and harder in my chest, something that rarely happens. The small rooms and subtlety of the background changes encourage multiple viewings. Especially if you want to get all the reference to other movies within the film, let the Easter eggs rain!
While I loved the movie, I wonder how the audience will look at this piece in the future. How well will it age? We now respond so well to the film because it is so timely. It speaks perfectly to the life everyone is living. The directors and writers themselves understood that they needed to get this out quickly because it was a part of this phenomenon. But classics are timeless; they have a quality that speaks beyond the time for which they are apart. Is this art going to transcend the isolation and fear of COVID to touch future audiences?
Written by Gemma Hurley, Rob Savage, and Jed Sheppard
Cast Haley Bishop, Jemma Moore, Emma Louise, Webb Radina, Drandova, Caroline Ward, Teddy Linard, and Seylan Baxter
When John Carpenter’s movie The Thing was released it paned. Critics HATED it and audiences avoided it. I was not until its release to television with repeated viewings by fans that the films popularity grew from cult status to reach culturally iconic status 30 years. Perhaps John Carpenter’s The Thing was doomed to be despised from the start; because its source material, Who Goes There? was derived from a time so opposite the social and political issues of its release time. Every movie has a time for which it speaks, and if it is release out of sync with that time, no matter how good it is, society at large just will not embrace it.
A lot can affect the success of a film opening; marketing, critic reviews, audience reception and access, or simultaneous releases. Essentially if the box office profits are not greater than the films expenses then the film is considered a failure. Even if a film does not meet expected profits, yet it makes money, it is still considered a failure. So, for example, Citizen Kane, despite positive critic reviews was ignored by the press when it was released and failed at the box office making only 1.5 million dollars. It is believed William Rudolph Hearst, a media mogul of the time was offended by the film’s villainous portrayal of a media mogul and so refused to allow marketing[i]. Fight club, considered by many a modern classic, was an enigma to studio marketers and critics alike and so it failed to find that essential early movie going audience.[ii]
Many people blame the failure of John Carpenters’ The Thing on the release of Steven Spielberg’s E.T. a few weeks prior. Pleading the audience loved Spielberg’s feel good alien and could not stomach the horrors of The Thing two weeks later. Arguably The Thing is the polar opposite of E.T. in every way except that they are both extraterrestrials. But to say the movie was too scary and dark is overly simplistic an answer. You could point to the success of Poltergeist as an argument that audiences were eager for horror, so the terror of The Thing was not the detracting factor. It was something deeper[iii].
Another movie, now critically acclaimed, that failed miserably at the box office that same year is Blade Runner, a science fiction adaptation of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. This is another dark movie where the view of humanity is dark, with an ambiguous, futuristic ending that leaves audiences with a bleak, hopeless feeling. These movies were released in 1982, the decade of the yuppie, Reganomics, and a return to conservative politics. Popular culture in the 80s reflected optimism, excess and overindulgence. It was the era of cocaine, hairbands, dissonant family values and teen angst. While beneath the surface of all the outward “yuppie” success the prevailing truth was a decade of stress and dissatisfaction. Audiences of The Thing were not yet prepared to see a movie whose voice was born from the great depression and spoke of distrust, paranoia and asked us what it means to be human.
In 1938 when John W. Campbell published Who Goes There? the Munich Pact was signed between Britain, France and Italy to let Germany partition Czechoslovakia. Hitler had marched into Austria and proclaimed it part of Germany. The Holocaust had truly begun as twenty to thirty thousand Jewish citizens were sent to concentration camps. The Germans had also discovered nuclear fission. The Atomic age had truly begun!
The United States we were just starting to recover from the Great Depression. Which great depression greatly reshaped the nation. No nation could face such a devastating crisis and not change. Migration altered our country’s population distribution. Toward the end of the Great depression America saw a resurgence of democratic virtues and the idealism of the “common man.” As totalitarian regimes spread thru Europe and Japan, the mythological American “Common man” hero became a staple of the pop culture of the time.
Enter John W Campbells Who Goes There? a novel where the common man is trapped by an unyielding environment and must overcome an enemy that hides within, disguising itself as one of the masses. In Campbell’s story a pervasive frustration and paranoia is rampant. The stories ambiguous ending leaves the reader unsettled and not quite sure if the alien escaped to take over the world. Did our heroes in fact stop it? Though the explorers are so sure they did, the reader himself is left to wonder and this feeling fits with the precarious state of the world. Throughout the book they argue amongst each other about the nature of what they find, whether they should examine it and if it is dead. The doctors among the group Blair and Dr. Cooper, argues about the safety of thawing the creature, and if any germs released would be compatible with human beings. Norris the groups physicist was concerned because certain animals on earth: “They freeze every winter and thaw every summer – for three months – and live.” But Blair states emphatically, “The beast is as dead as those frozen mammoths they find in Siberia.” Once the Thing wakes and they discover its nature it is Blair who first descends into paranoia and fear. He determines isolation is the only answer to the problem, much like America did when first faced with the idea of World War 2. As Europe descended into Madness it became their problem and only 13% of Americans wanted to intervene. It was not until the bombing of Pearl Harbor that American sentiment changed[iv]. Here Blair decides his only chance at survival is to lock himself away, after all who can he trust? “I don’t want anyone coming here. I’ll cook my own food… Kinner may be human now, but I don’t believe it.[v]” But soon enough they all distrust each other as they have no idea who is human and who is other. It is this tension, this fear of the other that makes this story so griping and horrifying. There is nowhere to run and readily identify a monster when it looks just like you. And why not. The Germans as they began over taking Europe did not look like monsters. You could not identify the monster with a glance.
Next comes the 1950’s and the most misunderstood era ever. Often held up as either the greatest era of our time or derailed as the most repressive and hated era of history, depending on your political ideals. To set the scene let me say, America was seen as the world’s strongest military power, with a booming economy. As Americans moved to the suburbs, they embraced consumerism whole heartedly. This was the post-war baby boom. The problems came from things we could not see[vi]. A fantastic movie depicting the suburban issues many vets faced is the 1956 classic The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit.
Aside from the obvious racism and segregation of the time, women faced a new problem as their families fled to isolation in the suburbs. Where before women had roles as organizers and fundraisers for museums, orphanages and hospitals, as credentialed professionals; now the government and society pushed them into a singular role of the housewife. Women found dissatisfaction in this new role and a dependency on Prozac as they tried to cope with the isolation and lack of purpose beyond the nuclear family.
While many think of the Fifties as the decade of thrift, in fact it is the era when America truly began to embrace excess. The suburbs were about affluence, unprecedented consumption and conformity. If your neighbor had it, you needed it too, debt be damned! Selling became less about procurement and more about status. The large middleclass suburbs gave birth to big box discount stores built first by Eugene Ferkauf, who sold discount appliances to suburban families.
As America became a global power anxiety about nuclear weapons marked this decade with fall out drills in school and adds for family fall out-shelters. We had dropped the bomb to win the war and now we were attempting to build The Super, a Hydrogen Bomb, before the Russians. No movie shows this better than the 1950 movie Destination Moon as America races to be the first to launch missiles from the moon and stay number one in the atomic Race.
Fear of juvenile delinquency, especially that of females pervaded popular culture. This is seen in movies like Rebel Without a Cause and West Side Story and campy horror movies like Teenage Zombies, The Violent Years, and Teenagers from Outer Space. As we moved into the fifties we were at the top of our global power, we had pulled ourselves out of the depression and were showing once again America was unstoppable. At this same time, TV was replacing radio as the new medium of popular culture. It had become less a luxury item and more affordable to the average American family. It began to spread from the coastal cities then gradually inward toward middle America. This lowered Movie sales and radio revenues making the TV the new national media. But it came at a price. “It could grant instant fame to a person or popularity to a fad and just as quickly withdraw that fame or popularity.” – Fred Allen[vii]. I would say this is true for the entertainment industry in general and many actors, comedians, producers and writers have fallen victim to the fickle whims of the entertainment industry.
In 1951, Christian Nyby attempted to make Who Goes There? Into a film under the name The Thing from Another World! It did better than all other science fiction movies that year making taking in 1.95 million at the American box office. Again, critics did not understand or feel the film was more than a monster movie. Now, decades later, critics and fans alike understand that this was not only the best Science Fiction film of 1951, but a ground-breaking film regardless of the genre you put it in. Margret Sheridan plays Nikki Nicholson, a strong female character who does not quake with fear waiting for the men around her to save her. She pursues her love interest, who quite frankly tried to get her drunk and have his way with her. It’s odd to see the fifties lens on sexual assault and how flippant and cut they make it. He is posed as the likable hero and she the hard and loveable gal who can put up with his boyish charm. Nikki takes command and walks beside him into danger. She is a tough, fast talking girl who quite honestly could be the first inkling of a final girl.
In a time of nuclear fear, while this film may portrays the female lead well, it certainly gives the scientist and his ilk the short end of the stick. It is fascinating to see how little they knew about radiation then. Their sample room, full of radioactive rocks was kept on base in a simple closet with no protection to the men and woman walking by it, daily absorbing all those extra “rays.” The creature itself is detected because he and his ship are radioactive making the Giger counter an important tool in this nuclear age movie. The head scientist becomes convinced that the creature must be protected regardless of the cost, that it is superior to man and holds the secrets to the stars. He wants to study the creature, understand it and unlock its mysteries. When others try to convince him of its danger Dr Carrington replies “There are no enemies in science, Professor, only phenomena to study. We are studying one.” Could there be a more chilling and unfeeling portrayal of science? Modern scientist had just created the most destructive force known to man the atomic bomb, and now our culture was dealing with the consequences and the morality of it. How did we feel about what we had done and the scientist who had created such destruction?
While in the book the Thing is hidden inside us, copying us, Nyby’s monster is distinctly other. This appealed to a time when McCarthyism was beginning to take hold of the country. The Other, the Communist was out there, and the common man, the patriotic American must be vigilant against him. So, it was only natural that the scientist become the protagonist alongside the monster and the hero became the American solider. By making these changes to the story, Nyby was able to adjust the crushing desperation and despair of the original story. He had a monster to face off against, our heroes fought and destroyed him, triumphing in the end, but sending a warning to stay ever vigilant for future attacks. As Ned, our newspaperman finally gets his broadcast he warns, “Every one of you listening to my voice, tell the world. Tell this to everybody wherever they are. Watch the skies! Everywhere. Keep looking. Keep watching the skies!” I think if these specific changes to the story had not been made the film would not have been as successful. The country was too hopeful, feeling it could take on the world and win. Though they knew the “bad guy” maybe lurking among us, most Americans were not really swept up in the fanaticism of McCarthy fervor.
Jump ahead thirty years to the magical era of the eighties. After the troubled times of the 1970s, ex. foreign turmoil and rising inflation; the rise of social, economic and political conservatism in the 1980s is not surprising. Often hailed as the decade of exuberant materialism and Reaganism, the 80s also saw the explosion of “yuppie” culture typified by the emergence of blockbuster video, cable TV and the Iconic MTV and its music video. As much as we like to think of this as the decade of decadence, the start of the 1980s was actually a horrible time for the film industry. In 1982, we saw the beginning of an upswing for some magic films and some disastrous flops! This year saw major flops like A midsummer Night’s Sex Comedy, Yes, Giorgio and Inchon. The most popular movies of the year were E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, Tootsie, An Officer and A Gentlemen, Rocky III, Porky’s, Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan, 48 Hrs. Poltergeist, The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas, and Annie. All movies that have happy endings by the way! Stephen Spielberg not surprisingly recently was quoted as saying “We’re nostalgic for the ‘80s because it was a stress-free decade, everything was sort of innocuous: style, music, it was great.[viii]”
As with the Fifties this could not be further from the truth. Underneath the pop veneer of Neon, MTV, synth sugar coating was the cold war, the crack epidemic, AIDS, The Iran Contra Affair and rampant consumerism that eventually lead to a second economic depression. Not only was there stress during this happy decade from the politics of the era, but social challenges faced by minorities and the LBGT community made further highlight the darker side of the eighties. The AIDS epidemic had taken 10,000 U.S. lives before Ronald Regan publicly acknowledged it. The AIDS epidemic isolated individuals and made an entire community a target. It was seen as a “Gay disease” and those with the disease were “Aids victims.” Government response to the Crack epidemic made matters worse for an entire generation putting a disproportionate amount of urban, black men in prison for small amounts of narcotics leaving them with a legacy of broken families and criminal records.
The New Right’s growth exploded as disaffected white liberals, unrestricted free market capitalist, evangelical Christians, and anti-tax crusaders came together to take over the right-wing party. The Cold War showed no signs of warming as arms control advocates on one side demanded a “Nuclear Freeze” and the other side continued to warn against the Soviet threat. As people moved from ageing Eastern coastal cities with their overcrowding, pollution and crime, they headed to the suburbs and rural regions of the Southeast, Southwest and California. These migrators became known as Sunbelters. They were tired of high taxes for social programs they saw no gains from, stagnating economies and government interference.
These disaffected Liberals eventual became known as “Regan Democrats” providing him the votes he needed to become governor of California and then President. Regan came through with campaign promises with government deregulation, reduction in government spending and tax cuts for individuals and corporations which became known as “Trickle down” economics. In 1982 Reaganomics proved less successful than hoped as the United States went into its worst depression since the Great Depression. Families lost homes, farmers lost their land and nine million people lost their jobs as of November 1982. After a slight recovery, just in time for his reelection campaign, the Stock Market crashed in 1987 another smaller decline, however; fans of Regan and his economic policies continued to grow popular.
Like most Americans Regan believed the Soviets and the spread of communism was a threat to freedom and democracy. He thus provided financial and military aid to anticommunist governments and insurgencies around the world with a policy known as the Regan Doctrine. In his eight years of office the Federal Government accrued more debt than in the entire history of the American Government. Regan also appointed Sandra Day O’Connor, the first woman to sit on the Supreme Court. Some of the other things he did during his presidency were: he worked with the Soviet Union to curtail the buildup of Nuclear Arms, visited West Berlin and delivered his famous “Tear Down That Wall” speech, he signed a bill prohibiting abortion assistance, and took responsibility for the Iran-Contra affair. Many American’s still consider Ronald Reagan one of America’s greatest Presidents.
The best way to explain the cold war I have ever heard is by Philip Roth in the Prague Orgy when describing the difference between the soviet block and the US, “There Nothing goes and everything matters; here, everything goes, and nothing matters.[ix]” Kind of explains how we think of the eighties no too. By the end of the 1980’s and the beginning of the 1990s the Cold War had defrosted, but at the beginning of the decade it was at its frostiest and suspicion of the Soviets was its highest. The extreme polarization is similar to today’s atmosphere between the democrats and republicans. It was very us versus them, America vs. the Reds, Democracy vs Communism. In response you have the iconic American culture, TOP GUN, and iconic alternative culture, the Smiths and their subtle anti-consumerism. These fans were the counterculture of the eighties[x].
This Political Conservatism is reflected in the 80s popular culture. The “Yuppie” is a college educated, well paid, baby boomer with expensive taste. Everyone believed there was a chance to completely change their life and 1980s Hollywood reflected this in many ways. Just look at movies like American Giglio and the Iconic Pretty Woman where a prostitute meets prince charming and blows him away😉, as well as Night Shift and the also Iconic Risky Business. You now had to do better than everyone else as well and you had to do it by yourself! The individualism highlighted by Americanism was in full swing in the eighties. This constant pressure highlights the underlying anxiety and self-doubt pervasive of the era. While us forty somethings may not have felt it as much because we were 10 and 12 at the time, the adults were certainly feeling the stress. While looking back I Remember my parents constantly worrying about money, while my siblings and I never thought of ourselves as poor because we had just as much as everyone around us. You have to wonder if we were struggling so much, why did we need the Betamax’s, VCRs, Jordache Jeans and yearly family vacations. Keeping up with the Jones’s is expensive and unnecessary! Poverty if oft not mentioned in the eighties, but it was pervasive. When it was shown in Hollywood though it was in stories of overcoming and rising above. Rocky is a classic example for here you see Stallone Rise-above-poverty and become uber rich as the movies progress. Ralph Macchio’s poverty in KarateKid has no grit or risks. It is the cleaned-up Malibu version with no real stakes[xi].
Many of the popular movies of the time appealed to movie goers of all ages and had an underlying message of optimism. Teen movies also had their heyday at this time with The Breakfast Club, Some Kind of Wonderful and Ferris Buller’s Day Off which still have cult followings. By the end of the 80s 60% of Americans had cable televisions and MTV which debuted on August 1, 1981 with the video Video Killed the Radio Star by The Buggles. This medium of television influenced the music industry, fashion and culture around the world. MTV became the Anti-Yuppie forum as time wore on, give those frustrated an outlet for their views, like Public Enemy and Heavy Metal acts[xii].
This was the stage for John Carpenters The Thing released in theatres on August 21, 1982. Full disclosure, I love this movie! I watched it for the first time hiding behind the couch as my parents watched it when it came out on video release in 1983, I remember being terrified and having nightmares for years, I was eight years old. I am always dumbfounded to hear this movie was hated by critics and moviegoers alike. But then I also loved blade runner and I am a self-proclaimed sci-fi junkie raised by parents who loved the genre. John Carpenters decision to stay as close as possible to the original source material, with its ambiguous ending and themes of suspicion, frustration and paranoia was ultimately the movies downfall and saving grace.
While the movie has been vindicated and is widely considered to be one of the best horror films of all time with groundbreaking practical effects that still hold up; in its day audiences and critics did not like or understand this movie. John Carpenter made the movie with $15 million, but the movie only made $19.6 million in domestically. Roger Ebert called it “A great barf-bag movie…. with superficial characterizations and implausible behavior.” Ebert hated the characters, the effects, the plot and premise. It was even nominated for a 1983 Worst Musical Score Razzie award. Writing for The New York Times, noted movie critic Vincent Canby described the movie as “foolish, depressing” with its actors “used merely as props to be hacked, slashed, disemboweled and decapitated, finally to be eaten and then regurgitated […] it is too phony to be disgusting. It qualifies only as instant junk.[xiii]” But I think what you are seeing here is a reaction not to the quality of the film, since obviously over time audience came to realize how amazing the film truly is, but to the time the film was released in.
In a time when everyone was trying to succeed and come out on top, when consumerism was at its highest regard and fear of the other (the reds, the junkie and the diseased) was at an all-time high, we are given a movie where all members were on equal footing, wealth means nothing and the enemy is inside us just will not land. It spoke to the underlying anxieties and unspoken realities we were not ready and unwilling to face in the eighties. In the movie, all the members of the station are at the mercy of the elements. They are stationed at Tule for eight weeks. John carpenter does a fantastic job of showing how everyone in the camp is essentially equal. While MacReady may be important because he can fly the Helicopter but once the copter is gone, it is only a person’s skills that makes them valuable, not money, birth or standing in the community. You must rely on your wits and each other. Then add into the mix that suddenly the people you are relying on to help you survive may not be who you think they are but are imposters. Who do you trust? How do you find out who is who? They had nowhere to run, they would die, so they had to solve the problem on their own. “See, what we’re talking about here is an organism that imitates other lifeforms, and it imitates them perfectly.” While this movie speaks to individualism, it’s talking about the absorption and destruction of the individual. As Blair says “He could have imitated a million life forms on a million planets, could change into any one of them at any time. Now it wants lifeforms on earth.” The movie builds its paranoia in an extremely stressful and anxious way. Benning’s is the first human to die after the dogs. This scene is burned into my child’s brain. The score burns behind the image as the camp surrounds the Benning’s Thing with his alien scream and malformed hand. The horror as the group realizes the alien is not just imitating “lower lifeforms” like dogs. Next Blair destroys not just the chopper but the stations radios too. “You think the thing wanted to be an animal? No dog makes it a thousand miles in the cold. Nah, you don’t understand. That thing wanted to be us! If the cell gets out, it could imitate everything on the face of the earth and it’s not going to stop!” Wilford Brimley commands the screen as he leaks fear and tension. If they do not succeed their lives and the future of mankind is on the line. And it only continues to get worse as they realize they have to figure out who is human and who is alien. The closed in sets, the cold, harsh environment are as much a character in this movie and the eleven actors. The eighties were stressful enough, where was the cathartic release? Where was the hope? Then, in the end there was no triumph or success. Just Jonesy (Keith David) and MacReady (Kurt Russell) sitting and waiting to see who’s who as they freeze to death. Dark and ambiguous. Fabulous! But not what eighties audiences were looking for.
As the cold war ended and we realized rampant consumerism was the path to massive debt, recession, environmental disaster and misery, audiences changed the way they consumed movies and empathized with the movie differently. Suddenly Carpenters movie made more sense. What do you think?
I did not discuss the prequel. But in 2011 a third installment was made that takes place at the sight of the nordic base before the 1982 movie. I offer no analysis, it has flaws and interesting moments. My favorite moment is the credits when they take you through and show you everything the others found at the base when they arrived.
 Morgan, Tiernan, The Decade that Changed the Art World: Money, Media, and Brands in the 1980s: The Primary Takeaway of Brand New at the Hirshhorn is its Demonstration of How High the Stakes of Representation Became During the 1980s, a Decade of Proliferating Imagery and Technology.” Hyperallergic 2018, May 10
[viii] Morgan, Tiernan, The Decade that Changed the Art World: Money, Media, and Brands in the 1980s: The Primary Takeaway of Brand New at the Hirshhorn is its Demonstration of How High the Stakes of Representation Became During the 1980s, a Decade of Proliferating Imagery and Technology.” Hyperallergic 2018, May 10
Butt Boy is the most incredibly kink shaming horror movie. I cannot believe it was made in 2019. Have we not yet moved beyond sex equals murder. I’ve never been more offended by a movie. Seriously! Sodomy is the portal to purgatory, not even a clever metaphor? Do better, move past making pleasure in sodomy the sign of a monster!
So obviously as you can tell I did not like the premise of this movie. It was a child’s joke taken to the extreme and sexualized. And I could lecture more why I felt this was low hanging fruit or why we need to do better. But instead I want to discuss the few things I did like.
Tyler Rice’s performance was fantastic. He was agonizingly broken, greasy and yet vulnerable. I wanted to know his story, I cared about his character. While I could care less about the wife or even the main character. The supporting cast was colorful. The styling of the set and cinematography were truly well done. The final chapter was just the right level of disgusting. I was nauseated by the foley work (Zach Landreneau), even as set design was not from a grand studio budget. The beauty of William Morean’s cinnamotogrphy makes up for the movies uneven pace and I am sure we will see Tyler Rice and Tyler Cornack again. Over all if you can get past the concept it is a fair movie. It’s like watching a movie while holding your nose. Something I just don’t want to do.
Blinded by the Light is a comeing of age tale set to an all Bruce sound track, not just playing the music but with as many direct quotes as possible. It is a feel good movie about a lonely, Pakistanis teenager in the late 80’s during a time [regrettably much like now (we’ve gone backwards)] in Europe where anti-immigrant sentiment was high and the economy was awful.
Javed’s family is very traditional, his father runs the family and he is expected to get a job as a lawyer in real estate. But Javed wants to be a writer. He wants more than the small town he feels trapped in and the small life his family is living. Is there more out there? Can a Pakistani Eurppean expect more? He is working toward his A levels so he can go to University. He makes a friend, Roops who introduces him to “The Boss” and thus the movie really starts.
The movie uses music through out the film to show how Javed is thinking about things and relating to his world. Bruce Springsteen’s Lyrics are super imposed on the screen as they take on significance to Javed or he quotes them as the meaning hits him. As he gains more and more confidence in himself he uses Bruce’s voice to help him express himself. Eventually he finds the strength to use his own words.
The scene where he first hears Springsteen’s music is powerful and effective. You see the music take hold of Javed as he looks around his world and the two different worlds blend perfectly. As Javed says, “he speaks to me.”
My second favorite scene is the complete music video for Born to Run in the middle of the movie. While it would seem indulgent, it is joyous and shows their sense of complete freedom. These are teenagers who see the world through a singular lens. They want to share it, it brings them joy, but are they seeing everyone else?
Javed’s foil, his father, played by Kulvinder Ghir, is struggling so hard to provide for his family. He has a beautiful scene with his wife where he shows a moment of vulnerability. He is supported so well by Meera Ganatra, they have lovely chemistry.
The end of the movie had me in tears and our theater clapped as the credits rolled. This did not happen for the last rock in roll movie I saw! It took me back to seeing Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band in the theaters as a little kid and seeing people sing the songs and cheer at the end. This movie had both joy for the music and a good story! Go see it and sing along!
filmography includes eleven movies that he has written and directed.
His plan is to only make one more two more and then move on to other
pursuits leaving his directorial filmography complete. Those movies
are Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown, Kill Bill Volume One,
Kill Bill Volume Two, Grind House Death Proof, Inglorious Bastards,
Django Unchained, The Hateful Eight, and now Once Upon a Time in
Hollywood. Tarantino likes to make films that look at a genre of film
and highlight great film makers. He plays homage to the greats while
creating something original, which is just one of the reasons why he
is so respected as a film maker. Yet to do this successfully you must
still have characters people care about, or want to watch and a well
developed story. Another score for Tarantino in Reservoir Dogs, Pulp
Fiction, Jackie Brown, Etc. His work is critically acclaimed and he
deserved the awards he has won. I grew up loving, quoting and
re-watching Reservoir dogs, Jackie Brown and Pulp Fiction. Inglorious
Bastards, Django Unchained and The Hateful Eight are two of my
favorite westerns. True Romance and Four Rooms, though not complete
directing credits are writing credits and I love those movies too, so
I have been looking forward to this fantasy twist of the Manson story
of Hollywood for a while. How would Tarantino play it? What part
would the Tate murders play in the story? What was his interest in
Tarantino it turns
out was interest in the friction between the two cultures that
existed during the end of the sixties. The rising hippy culture and
existing culture Hollywood. As always he was very aware of the
zeitgeist of the times he was portraying and he was exploring the
tension it created at the time and its affect on the put together,
uptight culture that preceded it. Rick Dalton, played so beautifully
by Leonardo DiCaprio is just one such aging actor of the sixties who
is not on the hippie train. He is watching his world crumble and
change as his flame is either extinguished or can go to ittaly and
make spaghetti westerns to try and salvage his dying carrer (sound
like anyone you know). While the film makes references to Steve
McQueen going so far as to show you the Great Escape, Clint Eastwood
kept poping up in my mind with Rawhide and then all of his westerns.
Will Rick be able to adapt to the new world he is living in or will
the “Fucking Hippies” get him? He is emotionally vulnerable,
often stuttering, dim witted, and breaks down into tears several
Brad pit plays his
long time friend, Cliff Booth, a man’s man and though slightly in
touch with the changing times more aware of his surrounding as well.
I am less aware of stunt men from the time, but there is a story to
his character that reminded me of the actor Robert Wagner. He is of
the times though often saying horrifically crass things like “Don’t
cry in front of the Mexicans” when Dalton breaks down outside of a
restaurant. But he is definitely more grounded.
The story is
essentially a buddy flick about these two characters decide what they
will do next with there lives and I wanted to know what would happen
next. I cared! Sharon Tate and Roman Polanski are side characters.
Margot Robbie does an excellent job, but she is unessential for most
of the movie. And of course, as with all Tarantino movies, history is
unimportant because this is a fairy tale and the ending is what he
wants it to be. As with Inglorious Bastards where he killed Hitler,
do not expect the evening on August 8, 1969 to go the way you expect.
As to the end of the
film. The only other thing I will reveal, because I do not believe in
revealing spoilers. I will warn you it is horrifically brutal. I am
somewhat desensitized to violence. I watch a lot of violent stuff
because of what I do and I have done some internships for school so
many times film violence does not bother me. This did. At first I was
laughing along with everyone else and then I cheered. And then I just
sat there appalled. It is graphic and a little much. It’s not even
that there is a lot of gore, it’s more the absolute brutality of
it, and perhaps slightly the reaction of my audience mixed in. I’m
not sure, but it disturbed me.
As to the rest of
the movie, there are a few pacing issues. A bout half way through the
movie I was ready for it to get moing a little faster. Pitt and
DiCaprio are fantastic together, I will go see them in any other
collaboration. The use of music was brilliant. Not just as
foreshadowing cues like Mrs Robinson’s when Pitt Meets Pussycat,
played by Margaret Qualley, but also “Out of Touch” as the
airport arrival song but also the use of commercials on the radio and
the fact that we got song snippets as they characters were driving
instead of full songs, showing they were actually traveling!
scene worth seeing and one of my favorites is the Cliff, Lee fight
scene. From the dialogue to the fight scene the entire thing was
hilarious. DiCaprio’s break out scene was his meltdown in the trailer
and his comeback lines with Luke Perry. He actually does such a good
job the whole movie its hard to pick just one scene because as I
write this I want to point out more but I don’t want to start
giving away anything.
I would love to say I loved this movie, but it’s more I loved the performances in it. I was bored at times, their was once again FEET (WHY, JUST WHY, three times no less?), and a pit bull is used to attack and maul someone. As if the dogs don’t have enough PR problems. This is not a Tarantino great film. Its OK and does not have to be seen on the big screen at all. If you can’t wait to go see it I won’t discourage you, but really at an average of $9.00 a ticket, I should never have a desire to check my phone in the middle of a movie. I liked his last two more, but this is definitely above Kill Bill which I did not like.
Once Upon a Time In Hollywood (US Release Date 7/26/2019) Writer, Director Quentin Tarantino Cast Brad Pitt, Leonardo DiCaprio, Margot Robbie, Luke Perry, Timothy Olyphant, Austin Butler, Maya Hawke, Margret Qualley, Dakota Fanning Trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EleMaP8EPAA
In the art of self defense we meet Casey who is scared and afraid all the time, but he is not a bad guy. He is a meek, timid nice guy you wouldn’t look at twice who is surrounded by asshole’s. His coworkers are wannabe alpha males constantly talking tough, especially about the boss, and putting down anyone they perceiveas weak. Casey one of only three decent people with lines in the movie the problem for Casey is that he is rejected by them and everyone else, thus is extremely lonely. He wants to make a change but just doesn’t know how and all the people around him are extreme jerks.
After an incident he finds his way to a dojo and wants to learn karate which usually has a positive influence in people’s lives. I myself have taken ninjutsu and I found it to be a great experience. Yes some people were too into it, like Casey at first, but the people in this dojo seen to be a little extra violent. To qoute a character “high levels of testosterone.” There’s just something off about the Sensei’s teaching’s as time goes on. He starts teaching Casey how to be a real man and things go off the rails.
Jesse Eisenberg’s performance as Casey is so compelling, you can feel his frustration, fear and growing confidence. Alessandro Nivola is so great as Sensei. Together they play so well against each other. Watching the scenes with Eisenberg and Nivola together were amazing. The color of Casey’s wardrobe was very well done too. He begins the movie wearing beiges and looking very plain and unassuming. As the movie moves on his wardrobe changes with his skill level, matching his belt. Whenever he is emasculated he is back in beige. Such a smart visual cue.
The Art of Self Defense is a lovely, dark, twisted comedy that will appeals to those who like original screenplays. I adored this money and found the ending to be truly hilarious the last fight scene was fabulous. I was so sad that I had to wait this long to see this movie as my theater took forever to show it. But it was worth watching. If you can’t see it in a theater, see it as soon as it comes out c on your streaming service. It is definitely worth supporting independent movies like this!
The Art of Self Defense (US Release Date 3/10/19)
Director Reiley Stearns
Writer Reiley Stearns
Cast Jesse Eisenberg, Alessandro Nivola, Imogen Poots, Steve Tereda
Ok guys, so let me tell you a little bit about my weekends. I usually see two to three movies, usually all in one day, for this blog. If I didn’t work I would see them Thursday or Friday the first showing I could, but unfortunately I am often stuck going Saturday. I don’t mind, this is a labor of love, an obsession really. But it is lovely when I get to actually enjoy the movie I see!
Stuber will never give down in history as a ground breaking, amazing movie. The script huge holes. Detective Vic, Dave Bautista’s character is a detective who could be considered legally blind without his glasses who is doggedly pursuing a drug dealer, Iko Uwais. He can’t drive because he got laser surgery to correct his eye sight so he ropes in an uber driver to help him catch a drug dealer? How does this make any sense. Even a loner on the force would have a friend he could call instead of endangering a civilian right. But who cares, because honestly this movie is hilarious and me and ALL of my fellow patrons were to busy laughing to care how crazy stupid the plot was.
Dave Bautista and Kumail Nanjiani have amazing chemistry together. Bautista is a great straight man for Nanjiani’s brand of wit. On top of that they both nailed the physical humor. By the time the got to the fight in the sporting goods store I was loudly laughing and I have not done that in a theater in YEARS. Solid humor with just a sprinkling of sincerity. The joke at the end landed. Definitely worth seeing if for no other reason than to encourage the production companies to make more movies that work like this.
Less big budget tech more good old fashion humor and fun. Unlike the other movie I watched this weekend I did not feel the time I spent on the seat and enjoyed every minute of it.
Stuber (US Release Date 7/11/2019)
Director Michael Dowse
Writer Tripper Clancy
Cast Dave Bautista, Kumail Nanjiani, Natalie Morales, Iko Uwais, Mira Sorvino
This will be a nice short review because let’s face it this was a nice short movie. There is very little to this movie so there is not to much to say. It centers on the story of a father and daughter trapped in a house inexplicably filled with alligators. The house was empty, but the neighborhood wasn’t so the premise is flimsy, but hey, suspension of disbelief people. So let’s go along for the ride and have fun right. Eh, maybe.
There are some good jump scares, some touching scenes, a few tense moments. None of the deaths are particularly gruesome. Bucking the recent movie trend, SPOILER, the dog might actually make it. Over all I felt like this movie just did not push it. At the end I kind of wanted the alligators to win. This was just a blah movie that I will forget about by the time I drive home.
Crawl (US Release Date 7/11/2019)
Director Alexander Aja
Writer Michael and Shawn Rasmussen
Cast Kaya Suadelsnio, Barry Peper, Ami Metcalf, Colin Mcfarlane, Anson Boon
What I love about the Marvel universe is that they have always know how to keep things light. While DC is dark, brooding and ultra violent. Marvel remembers to serve up its end of the world level violence with light hearted jokes and an ability to laugh at itself too. Spiderman Far From Home is no exception. Pre-credits we are introduced to Nick Fury, Agent Smulders, and Mysterio.
After the credits we are treated to a memorial of those who have fallen: Iron Man, Capain America. The Black Widow and Tony Stark. Done so well I thought they were seriously dedicating this movie to the characters they killed. But wait for it, it, there’s a reason. And it is good and funny!
This movie of course, continues one year after the end of Avengers Endgame. The return of the dead has been called the Blip creating it’s own unique set of story lines for the world to deal with. Peter Parker after going through so much in the last adventure just wants a vacation. Unfortunately, Mysterio needs his help defeating elemental monsters that are appearing in our world and trying to destroy it. There is of course a struggle of conscience, a plot twist, and the ultimate question of who will be the next Iron Man.
First off I love Zendaya’s MJ. She is Sassy and dark with out being stereotypical goth. She’s just smart and quirky. Their romance is done well without being overbearing.
Tom Holland does a fantastic job playing a Spiderman who isn’t afraid to be a hero, but is afraid to be the world’s hero. It is easy to make Spiderman a whiny bitch. That’s a common problem in many of the other iterations before this. These current movies do a great job, by one keeping him in highschool, two making him funny but not whinny, and three making him earnest but not obnoxious. It’s a hard balance between awkward teen and annoying wiseass no one really likes. We care about Peter and want him to make the right call. Even when he doesn’t, however; you get it and just want yo see him fix it. Cause you know he will.
When Mysterio finally uses his powers it is great. You found yourself thinking how can you possibly fight this. The final battle was worth watching! And the answer they come up with as to who will take Starks place is well done.
I think this movie is worth the theater trip. Fair warning, pee before it starts so you can stay for the two scenes in the credits.
Spiderman Far From Home (US release date 7/4/2019)
Director Jon Watts
Writer Chris McKenna, Erik Sommers
Cast Tom Holland, Marisa Tomei, Samuel L Jackson, Jake Gyllenhaal, Jon Favreau, Jacob Batalon, Zendaya
In my home growing up, the Beatles was part of my musical education. My parents, being hippies, introduced me to the Beatles, the Steve Miller Band, and John Taylor. Not only did I have Sgt Pepper Lonelyhearts Club Band on record, but when it was rereleased in theaters we went to see the movie too. Every year I watched the Yellow Submarine on TV. They were two of my favorite musicals growing up, aside from Grease of course. So yeah, I was excited for this movie.
So what did I think? For starters, Himesh Patel is a standout. Not only does he do a fantastic job acting in the movie, his facial expressions are perfect, but his singing is great. He gets the emotional tone of each song spot on. While yesterday was poignant, Help Me was a cry of frustration and desperation. Then at the same time you get moments where you see he knows nothing about the songs except the words and melody. Why? He didn’t write them.
The twist in the movie are genuinely unexpected but fit the story line beautifully.
Ed Sheeran does a great job portraying himself. Unsurprisingly Kate McKinnon is awesome. I adored his parents played by Sanjeev Bashkar and Meera Syal.
The only part of the story I could have done without is the romance between Jack and Ellie. Are we really supposed to believe that this woman who has been his biggest fan and supporter since the 6th grade suddenly finds she cannot support him when he becomes famous? Of course this movie is written by a man because they cannot write a good role for a woman. I would have believed it if she had realised the songs weren’t his on her own, found his behavior suspicious, or just got fed up and said “I can’t keep waiting for you to love me so bye” and made a clean break. Instead their entire love story is that he must choose between success and her, even though until now she’s the one who has been pushing him to pursue his career. I liked the moral delimea about taking credit for the songs. But the love story needed major rewriting. I did not mind how it all ended up so over all I say finish reading and go get your tickets.
Yesterday (US release date 6/28/2019)
Director Danny Boyle
Writers Jack Barth. Richard Curtis
Cast Himesh Patel, Lily James, Mira Syal, Kate McKinnon, Ed Sheeran, Joe, Fry, Sanjeev Bhaskar